| E5: PROP. 21. The mind can only imagine anything, or remember what is past, while the body endures. |
| Proof.--The mind does not express the actual existence of its body, nor does it imagine the modifications of the body as actual, except while the body endures (E2P8C); and, consequently (E2P26), it does not imagine any body as actually existing, except while its own body endures. Thus it cannot imagine anything (for definition of Imagination, see E2P17CN), or remember things past, except while the body endures (see definition of memory E2P18N). Q.E.D. |
| Referenced in: E5P29,- E5P31,- E5P34,- E5P38N,- E5P40C |
| E5: PROP. 22. Nevertheless in God there is necessarily an idea, which expresses the essence of this or that human body under the form of eternity. |
| Proof.--God is the cause, not only of the existence of this or that human body, but also of its essence (E1P25). This essence, therefore, must necessarily be conceived through the very essence of God (E1A4), and be thus conceived by a certain eternal necessity (E1P16); and this conception must necessarily exist in God (E2P3). Q.E.D. |
| Referenced in: E5P23 |
| E5: PROP. 23. The human mind cannot be absolutely destroyed with the body, but there remains of it something which is eternal. |
| Proof.--There is necessarily in God a concept or idea, which expresses the essence of the human body (last Prop. E5P22), which, therefore, is necessarily something appertaining to the essence of the human mind (E2P13). But we have not assigned to the human mind any duration, definable by time, except in so far as it expresses the actual existence of the body, which is explained through duration, and may be defined by time --that is (E2P8C), we do not assign to it duration, except while the body endures. Yet, as there is something, notwithstanding, which is conceived by a certain eternal necessity through the very essence of God (last Prop. E5P22); this something, which appertains to the essence of the mind, will necessarily be eternal. Q.E.D. |
| Referenced in: E5P29,- E5P31,- E5P38,- E5P40C |
| E5: PROP. 23, Note.
--This idea, which expresses the
essence of the body under the form of
eternity,
is, as we have said, a certain
mode of thinking, which belongs
to the essence of the mind,
and is necessarily
eternal. Yet it is not
possible that we should remember that we existed before our body, for our
body can bear no trace of such existence, neither can
eternity be defined
in terms of time,
or have any relation to time. But, notwithstanding, we
feel and know that we are
eternal.
For the mind feels those things that it conceives by
understanding,
no less than those things that it remembers.
For the eyes of the mind,
whereby it sees and observes things, are none
other than proofs.
Thus, although we do not remember that we existed before the body, yet we feel that our mind, in so far as it involves the essence of the body, under the form of eternity, is eternal, and that thus, its existence cannot be defined in terms of time, or explained through duration. Thus our mind can only be said to endure, and its existence can only be defined by a fixed time, in so far as it involves the actual existence of the body. Thus far only has it the power of determining the existence of things by time, and conceiving them under the category of duration. |
| E5: PROP. 24. The more we understand particular things, the more do we understand God. |
| Proof.--This is evident from E1P25C. |
| Referenced in: E5P25,- E5P27 |
| E5: PROP. 25. The highest endeavour of the mind, and the highest virtue is to understand things by the third kind of knowledge. |
| Proof.--The third kind of knowledge proceeds from an adequate idea of certain attributes of God to an adequate knowledge of the essence of things (see its definition E2P40N2); and, in proportion as we understand things more in this way, we better understand God (by the last Prop. E5P24); therefore (E4P28) the highest virtue of the mind, that is (E4D8) the power, or nature, or (E3P7) highest endeavour of the mind, is to understand things by the third kind of knowledge. Q.E.D. |
| Referenced in: E5P27 |
| E5: PROP. 26. In proportion as the mind is more capable of understanding things by the third kind of knowledge, it desires more to understand things by that kind. |
| Proof.--This is evident. For, in so far as we conceive the mind to be capable of conceiving things by this kind of knowledge, we, to that extent, conceive it as determined thus to conceive things; and consequently (Def. of the Emotions, E3DOE1), the mind desires so to do, in proportion as it is more capable thereof. Q.E.D. |
| E5: PROP. 27. From this third kind of knowledge arises the highest possible mental acquiescence. |
| Proof.--The highest virtue of the mind is to know God (E4P28), or to understand things by the third kind of knowledge (E5P25), and this virtue is greater in proportion as the mind knows things more by the said kind of knowledge (E5P24): consequently, he who knows things by this kind of knowledge passes to the summit of human perfection, and is therefore (Def . of the Emotions, E3DOE2) affected by the highest pleasure, such pleasure being accompanied [E2P43] by the idea of himself and his own virtue; thus (Def. of the Emotions, E3DOE25), from this kind of knowledge arises the highest possible acquiescence. Q.E.D. |
| Referenced in: E5P32,- E5P36CN,- E5P38N |
| E5: PROP. 28. The endeavour or desire to know things by the third kind of knowledge cannot arise from the first, but from the second kind of knowledge. |
| Proof.--This proposition is self-evident. For whatsoever we understand clearly and distinctly, we understand either through itself, or through that which is conceived through itself; that is, ideas which are clear and distinct in us, or which are referred to the third kind of knowledge E2P40N2 cannot follow from ideas that are fragmentary and confused, and are referred to knowledge of the first kind, but must follow from adequate ideas, or ideas of the second and third kind of knowledge; therefore (Def. of the Emotions, E3DOE1), the desire of knowing things by the third kind of knowledge cannot arise from the first, but from the second kind. Q.E.D. |
| E5: PROP. 29. Whatsoever the mind understands under the form of eternity, it does not understand by virtue of conceiving the present actual existence of the body, but by virtue of conceiving the essence of the body under the form of eternity. |
| Proof.--In so far as the
mind
conceives the present existence
of its body, it to that extent conceives
duration which can be determined by
time,
and to that extent only has it the power of conceiving things in
relation to time (E5P21 and
E2P26). But
eternity cannot be explained
in terms of duration
(E1D8).
Therefore to this extent the mind has not
the power of conceiving things under the form of eternity,
But it possesses such power, because it is of the nature of reason to conceive things under the form of eternity (E2P44C2), and also because it is of the nature of the mind to conceive the essence of the body under the form of eternity (E5P23), for besides these two there is nothing which belongs to the essence of mind (E2P13). Therefore this power of conceiving things under the form of eternity only belongs to the mind in virtue of the mind's conceiving the essence of the body under the form of eternity. Q.E.D. |
| Referenced in: E5P31,- E5P32C,- E5P37,- E5P38,- E5P40C |
| E5: PROP. 29, Note. --Things are conceived by us as actual in two ways; either as existing in relation to a given time and place, or as contained in God and following from the necessity of the divine nature. Whatsoever we conceive in this second way as true or real, we conceive under the form of eternity, and their ideas involve the eternal and infinite essence of God, as we showed in E2P45 and E2P45N, which see. |
| E5: PROP. 30. Our mind, in so far as it knows itself and the body under the form of eternity, has to that extent necessarily a knowledge of God, and knows that it is in God, and is conceived through God. |
| Proof.-- Eternity is the very essence of God, in so far as this involves necessary existence (E1D8). Therefore to conceive things under the form of eternity, is to conceive things in so far as they are conceived through the essence of God as real entities, or in so far as they involve existence through the essence of God; wherefore our mind, in so far as it conceives itself and the body under the form of eternity, has to that extent necessarily a knowledge of God, and knows, etc. Q.E.D. |
| Referenced in: E5P31,- E5P32 |
| E5: PROP. 31. The third kind of knowledge depends on the mind, as its formal cause, in so far as the mind itself is eternal. |
| Proof.--The mind does not conceive anything under the form of eternity, except in so far as it conceives its own body under the form of eternity (E5P29); that is, except in so far as it is eternal (E5P21 and E5P23); therefore (by the last Prop. E5P30), in so far as it is eternal, it possesses the knowledge of God, which knowledge is necessarily adequate (E2P46); hence the mind, in so far as it is eternal, is capable of knowing everything which can follow from this given knowledge of God (E2P40), in other words, of knowing things by the third kind of knowledge E2P40N2, whereof accordingly the mind (E3D1), in so far as it is eternal, is the adequate or formal cause of such knowledge. Q.E.D. |
| Referenced in: E5P33 |
| E5: PROP. 31, Note.
--In proportion, therefore, as a man is more potent in this kind of
knowledge, he will be more completely conscious of himself and of God; in
other words, he will be more perfect and blessed, as will appear more
clearly in the sequel.
But we must here observe that, although we are already certain that the mind is eternal, in so far as it conceives things under the form of eternity, yet, in order that what we wish to show may be more readily explained and better understood, we will consider the mind itself, as though it had just begun to exist and to understand things under the form of eternity, as indeed we have done hitherto; this we may do without any danger of error, so long as we are careful not to draw any conclusion, unless our premisses are plain. |
| E5: PROP. 32. Whatsoever we understand by the third kind of knowledge, we take delight in, and our delight is accompanied by the idea of God as cause. |
| Proof.--From this kind of knowledge arises the highest possible mental acquiescence, that is (Def. of the Emotions, E3DOE25), pleasure, and this acquiescence is accompanied by the idea of the mind itself (E5P27), and consequently (E5P30) the idea also of God as cause. Q.E.D. |
| Referenced in: E5P32C,- E5P36,- E5P42 |
| E5: PROP. 32, Corollary.--From the third kind of knowledge necessarily arises the intellectual love of God. |
| From this kind of knowledge arises [by E5P32] pleasure accompanied by the idea of God as cause, that is (Def. of the Emotions, E3DOE6), the love of God; not in so far as we imagine him as present (E5P29), but in so far as we understand him to be eternal; this is what I call the intellectual love of God. |
| Referenced in: E5P33N,- E5P35,- E5P36,- E5P42 |
| E5: PROP. 33. The intellectual love of God, which arises from the third kind of knowledge, is eternal. |
| Proof.--The third kind of knowledge is eternal (E5P31 and E1A3); therefore (by the same Axiom) the love which arises therefrom is also necessarily eternal. Q.E.D. |
| Referenced in: E5P33N,- E5P37,- E5P39 |
| E5: PROP. 33, Note. --Although this love towards God has (by the foregoing Prop. E5P33) no beginning, it yet possesses all the perfections of love, just as though it had arisen as we feigned in the Coroll. of the last Prop. E5P32C. Nor is there here any difference, except that the mind possesses as eternal those same perfections which we feigned to accrue to it, and they are accompanied by the idea of God as eternal cause. If pleasure consists in the transition to a greater perfection, assuredly blessedness must consist in the mind being endowed with perfection itself. |
| E5: PROP. 34. The mind is, only while the body endures, subject to those emotions which are attributable to passions. |
| Proof.-- Imagination is the idea wherewith the mind contemplates a thing as present (E2P17CN); yet this idea indicates rather the present disposition of the human body than the nature of the external thing (E2P16C2). Therefore emotion (see general Def. of Emotions E3DOE) is imagination, in so far as it indicates the present disposition of the body; therefore (E5P21) the mind is, only while the body endures, subject to emotions which are attributable to passions. Q.E.D. |
| E5: PROP. 34, Corollary.--Hence it follows that no love save intellectual love is eternal. |
| E5: PROP. 34 Corollary, Note. --If we look to men's general opinion, we shall see that they are indeed conscious of the eternity of their mind, but that they confuse eternity with duration, and ascribe it to the imagination or the memory which they believe to remain after death. |
|
|
|
|
| Slack padding. |