Crime and Environment

n    Niches and natural areas for crime (Park and Burgess)

n    Concentric zones and disadvantage (Shaw and McKay/Faris and Dunham)

n    Social disorganization and disenfranchisement – zones in transition, housing projects (mapping)

n    Crime and grime hypothesis/broken windows – neighborhood resources (Wilson and Kelling)

 

Biopsychosocial approach

n    Crime, criminals and victims are too narrowly defined by biology, demographics, psychology, and sociology

n    suggests a disconnect between economic conditions and crime in that crime rates increased as economy improved since 1960s

n    Could have to do with reporting changes, more CJ resources, more criminal opportunities, and less social control

Social Strain vs.Social Control

n    Why do people commit crime? (strain)

n    Why are most people law abiding?

n    Frustration Aggression theory/strain (Merton) – conform, innovate, ritual, retreat, rebel

n    Social Bonds (Hirschi) – attachment to family, involvement in community, commitment to school etc., belief in communal norms, values

n    Self control and neighborhood efficacy

Victims

n   Demographics – gender, age, race

n   Environment – housing, location

n   Reporting practices

Victims and Age

Criminals

n   They violate law and can be punished.

n   Criminals in every society.

n   Criminal justice system defines typical criminals by who they process and protect us from.

n   Typical Criminals or Typical suspects?

 

Typical Criminals in United States

n   Young urban males

n   Poor

n   Disproportionately black

n   Differ in physique, intelligence, personality

n   Sub-cultural – crime rewarding

n   Psychopathic – no empathy

 

Racial trends

n   Crime intraracial – within race

n   Whites DWI, Asians gambling, Blacks crimes of violence

n   Targetted law enforcement

n   Culmulative disadvantage – institutional racism, perception of threat, family disruption

 

Gender gap in offending

n    Gender ratio – 20-25%, Rates parallel to men in ebb and flow

n    Generalizabilty - Theories

n    Gendered crime - Differing offenses – runaway, less violent

n    Gendered pathways - Excluded, insulated from organized crime

n    Gender lives – different turning points than men

Female Offenders

n   1980 – 1989, 200% increase

n   24% of all suspects

n   15% incarcerated jails and prisons

n   Differing demographics

n   Different types of criminality

n   Differing correctional need

Index Offenses

Why are Women more involved with the Criminal Justice System?

n   Shift domestic to commercial sphere

n   1960s women’s movement backlash

n   change in families

n   Change in policing practices

n   Relative deprivation theory