As you compile a list of reading completed or planned, annotate
the list to indicate the relevance of the article or book chapter to your topic. Assembling an Annotated Bibliography serves several functions:
You take stock of the significance of the reading in light of your current project definition and priorities (see also Active Digestion, including Annotating);You provide your advisors and other readers with a basis to help you identify holes and any mismatch between what you are reading and your Governing Question; andYou compose sentences that may find their way into your writing.
When choosing what to include in the bibliography, quantity is less important than a clear relationship of the readings to the evolving focus of your project. There is no need to pack or pad the bibliography with zillions of references uncovered in your searches. Instead, use the compilation of a bibliography to stimulate the process of clarifying whether and in what ways an article is relevant to your project. Omit readings that no longer relate to the current direction of your project.
Because your topic might have changed or should be more concise by the time you submit this bibliography to your advisor, take stock of that, and compose a revised single Paragraph Overview
of the current topic and Governing Question. Having a tighter overview statement will help you and your advisor to expose changes, gaps, and ambiguities. Comments by others on your initial statement also help, allowing that you can ignore comments rendered irrelevant by changes in your direction.
Consult a writing manual (e.g., Turabian 2007) to decide on a citation style, then use this consistently as you compile your bibliography—you do not have time to redo citations later. Establishing and maintaining a bibliographic database streamlines the work of formatting of references.
(See Phase B
Turabian, K. L. (2007). A Manual For Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations
. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.