CCT 698 Practicum	Course no. & Name				1 = very much
	Peter Taylor	Professor				2 = somewhat
	Fall 2000	Semester & Year				3 = a little
	14	No. of respondents				4 = not at all
						5 = does not apply
						Breakdown %s				#
Question		Mean	SD	N		1s	2s	3s	4s	5s
1	clear course objectives/ learning outcomes	1.1	0.3	14		93	0	7	0	0
2	planned to make effective use of class time	1.6	0.7	14		57	36	0	7	0
3	interested in students' learning	1.0	0.0	14		100	0	0	0	0
4	variety of teaching strategies	1.4	0.2	14		64	36	0	0	0
5	available during office hours &appts	1.0	0.0	14		100	0	0	0	0
6	reliable, punctual	1.1	0.1	14		93	7	0	0	0
7	accommodated individuals' needs	1.0	0.0	14		100	0	0	0	0
8	no favoratism in grading, feedback	1.1	0.1	14		93	7	0	0	0
9	classroom process conducive to learning	1.2	0.2	14		79	21	0	0	0
10	knowledgeable about content	1.2	0.1	13		85	15	0	0	1
11	communicated effectively & stimulating	1.5	0.4	14		57	36	7	0	0
12	modeled advocacy for social justice & equity	1.3	0.4	13		77	15	8	0	1
13	objectives shaped to meet student needs	1.1	0.1	14		93	7	0	0	0
14	covered current research, practice & issues	1.2	0.2	14		79	21	0	0	0
15	clear theoretical foundation	1.2	0.3	14		86	7	7	0	0
16	textbook & readings contributed to learning	1.2	0.3	14		86	7	7	0	0
17	assignments & fieldwork contibuted (ditto)	1.6	0.5	14		57	29	14	0	0
18	exercises to think critically & creatively	1.1	0.1	14		86	14	0	0	0
19	increased understanding of urban settings	1.0	0.0	13		100	0	0	0	1
20	… of diversity	1.2	0.3	14		86	7	7	0	0
21	… of exceptionalities	2.0	0.5	11		27	45	27	0	3
22	… of assessment	1.8	0.6	10		40	40	20	0	4
23	… of technology	1.8	0.3	11		27	64	9	0	3
24	… of scholarly practice	1.7	0.9	11		55	27	9	9	3
25	helped me to be knowledgeable & skilled	1.5	0.4	13		54	38	8	0	1
26	… to be caring, principled, and respectful	1.2	0.2	14		79	21	0	0	0
27	… more committed to social justice	1.2	0.3	14		86	7	7	0	0
28	… more reflective & critical thinker	1.6	0.4	11		45	45	9	0	3
29	I would recommend this instructor to others	1.4	0.5	9		67	22	11	0	5
	Combined overall	1.3	0.3	13.1		76	19	5	1	0.9
Written Comments (abbreviated)
	Q.30 How was this course helpful to you?
1	Showed me that I can conceive of large projects w/ different types of sub-work (?) & execute
	w/o panic
2	This course helped me to engage myself in the research process like I have never before -
	I am more confident than ever in my strenghts and more aware of my weaknesses than I
	ever thought posssible.
4	I came away with wonderful research tools and a better attitude about my writing.
5	Got me started on my synthesis project.
6	Helped me move towards goals in CCT program - prepared me for synthesis, built on my work in
	all previous CCT courses.
8	Challenged me to work towards my research goals & gave me the tools I needed to achieve them.
9	I learned a systematic approach to reaearch that was creative and engaging.
10	It helped you develop work on your particular mode in your own style. Knowing your own style
	helps you plan adequately.
11	It was a personal and professional benefit to have worked through the process.
12	My attitude in learning process is changed. I focus more on the process than the product. I
	acknowledge that to achieve my goal I have to take effort to on the product.
13	taught great (?) approach to research and writing
14	Very valuable model for doing academic research.
	Q.31 What did the instructor do that helped you learn?
1	Respectful of learner's process+ work & can articulate what he perceives the work is
	extremely well.
2	Professor Taylor's ability to communicate the idea of learning and research as a process cannot
	be overstated. I am leaving this course with many different tools and a confidence that I can and
	will continue to use them.
3	Exercises/ 1 on 1 conferences/team groups/ Library workshop.
4	Provided insight through revise and resubmit process
5	Structured a long, enormous process into manageable steps with appropriate support & feedback.
6	His revise & resubmit process is excellent, provides good, helpful feedback & allows for
	intellectual growth.
8	Peter was thorough & detailed in his feedback, available for meetings, & wholly dedicated to the
	students in this course.
9	Peter's open nature provided a safe environment which made me more comfortable for taking
	risks. His expertise & knowledge were apparent in his approach as he was a good model.
10	Feedback on assignments. Discussion w/ other students during class. Assignments helped you
	employ a variety of learning meanings(?)
11	He required submit, revise, resubmit & tho' it was a challenge, it helped me learn a lot
12	instructed me clearly and helped me right on track during the process/ accessible outside classroom/
	accepted different learning styles and ability.
13	variety of assignments put into practice various approaches to synthesizing material & refining ideas
14	Very valuable written feedback.
	Q.32 What could the instructor have done differently to help you learn?
1	Maybe more library research techniques, keyword searches.
2	I cannot imagine anything.
3	Clearer syllabus.
4	At times clearer communication with one-on-one conference.
5	No complaints.
6	Nothing-- course was great.
9	Nothing -- I think he did a great job.
10	No response.
11	Ask more questions about an assignment & ? direction to help me formulate my ideas, but I think
	I was looking for a magic light to shine & give ne the answers,
12	No.
14	I don't know. It was very comprehensive and engaging.