|
CCT 697B CCT in Practice |
Course no. & Name |
1 = very much |
|
|
|
Peter Taylor |
Professor |
|
|
2 = somewhat |
|
|
|
Fall 2000 |
Semester & Year |
|
3 = a little |
|
|
|
2 |
No. of respondents |
4 = not at all |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 = does not apply |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Breakdown %s |
# |
| Question |
Mean |
SD |
N |
|
1s |
2s |
3s |
4s |
5s |
| 1 |
clear course objectives/ learning outcomes |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 2 |
planned to make effective use of class time |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 3 |
interested in students' learning |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 4 |
variety of teaching strategies |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 5 |
available during office hours &appts |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 6 |
reliable, punctual |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 7 |
accommodated individuals' needs |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 8 |
no favoratism in grading, feedback |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 9 |
classroom process conducive to learning |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 10 |
knowledgeable about content |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 11 |
communicated effectively & stimulating |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 12 |
modeled advocacy for social justice & equity |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 13 |
objectives shaped to meet student needs |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 14 |
covered current research, practice & issues |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 15 |
clear theoretical foundation |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 16 |
textbook & readings contributed to learning |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 17 |
assignments & fieldwork contibuted (ditto) |
1.0 |
0.0 |
1 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| 18 |
exercises to think critically & creatively |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 19 |
increased understanding of urban settings |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 20 |
… of diversity |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 21 |
… of exceptionalities |
3.0 |
0.0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
100 |
0 |
1 |
| 22 |
… of assessment |
1.5 |
0.3 |
2 |
|
50 |
50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 23 |
… of technology |
1.0 |
0.0 |
1 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| 24 |
… of scholarly practice |
1.5 |
0.3 |
2 |
|
50 |
50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 25 |
helped me to be knowledgeable & skilled |
3.0 |
0.0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
100 |
0 |
1 |
| 26 |
… to be caring, principled, and respectful |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 27 |
… more committed to social justice |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 28 |
… more reflective & critical thinker |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 29 |
I would recommend this instructor to others |
1.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
|
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| |
Combined overall |
1.1 |
0.2 |
1.9 |
|
93 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
0.1 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Written Comments (abbreviated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q.30 How was this course helpful to you? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
The course provided a whole new context for the application of
what I am learning in other CCT |
|
courses. It also provided me with an opportunity to see what my
peers are engaged in. |
|
|
| 2 |
It was helpful in the way that it gave me a more focused and
clear mind towards thinking. |
|
|
Q.31 What did the instructor do that helped you
learn? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
Gave me more avenues to view things. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
The fact that each week he's led by a different guest made for a variety of different insights and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
perspectives - the emphasis on applying the material to my own
studies was also quite beneficial. |
|
Q. 32 What could the instructor have done
differently to help you learn? |
|
| 1 |
I can think of nothing at the moment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
Not much. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|