[snip] I do not consider myself to be "religious" in any ordinary sense of the term and I will go even further and say that I do not consider Jesus himself to be a "Christian" in any way in which I perceive that term to be used by others around me. I also do not consider Spinoza to be "Jewish" (nor, apparently did he consider himself as such once he came to a clear idea of his own nature and of God), nor do I consider Buddha to be a "Buddhist". Such is the nature of the human imagination that we each automatically come to have mostly confused and fragmentary ideas involving the "external world" in which our body is formed. Particular "religions" are merely labels for one or another common set of emotions and other confused ideas shared by one or another particular group of individuals. I suspect that this might sound terrible to most people but I equate "particular religions" with "superstition". Spinoza wrote:
======= E3: DOE. 27:
This is confirmed by experience. For custom and religion are not the same
among all men, but that which some consider sacred others consider profane, and
what some consider honourable others consider disgraceful. According as each man
has been educated, he feels repentance for a given action or glories therein. Now, Spinoza also uses the terms "God", "religion", "piety", etc. but he does not apply them exclusively to any particular group of individuals or set of moral rules, etc., each of which varies according to the common imaginations of those individuals involved (as indicated above), but, rather, he applies the terms strictly to clear and adequate ideas and to those who live according to Reason which is common to all and which cannot be identified with any particular group or set of moral rules. He wrote:
======= E4: PROP. 37, Note 1:
Again, whatsoever we desire and do, whereof we are the cause in so far as
we possess the idea of God, or know God [not imagine "God", of course, but
have an adequate idea of God or Nature -TNeff], I set down to Religion. The
desire of welldoing, which is engendered by a life according to reason, I call
piety. Further, the desire, whereby a man living according to reason is bound to
associate others with himself in friendship, I call honour [Honestas]; by
honourable I mean that which is praised by men living according to reason, and
by base I mean that which is repugnant to the gaining of friendship.
I have also shown in addition what are the foundations of a state; and the
difference between true virtue and infirmity may be readily gathered from what
I have said; namely, that true virtue is nothing else but living in accordance
with reason; while infirmity is nothing else but man's allowing himself to be
led by things which are external to himself, and to be by them determined to act
in a manner demanded by the general disposition of things rather than by his own
nature considered solely in itself. Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Taoism, Hinduism, etc., and even "Spinozaism" in so far as it is considered by some to be rooted in Judaism, or in anything other than Reason, each belongs only to our imagination. Reason is common to all and has nothing to do with any historic sequence of events or particular set of beliefs or moral rules whether Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, etc. [snip] Best Regards, Terry |
BACK to Personal Notes menu.