Search the Collection Return to Browsing the Collection
About the Witchcraft Collection Return to Home Page
Help for Using the Witchcraft Collection

Document name: The Literature of Demonology and Witchcraft
Go to:
View as:
Current page: Page NA (image 6 of 11) previous page || next page


Text of page:

Page: 6

In Scotland witchcraft became a statutory crime in 1563, and the first large-scale witch trials began in 1591. Scotland had an entirely different legal system, social structure, and church from those in England. But neither England nor Scotland can be studied any longer in isolation. As James Sharpe, the best recent historian of witchcraft in England, has said, "It is now, I would contend, impossible to sustain the idea that there was a separate 'English' witchcraft to be set against a monolithic 'Continental' witchcraft: the English experience of the phenomenon was a variation on a European theme."12 That theme was profound; the best recent estimates suggest that around one hundred and ten thousand people were tried for witchcraft in different parts of Europe in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and that between forty and sixty thousand were executed. These numbers, of course, only become useful when measured in the context of other instances of crime and punishment and other kinds of judicial practice.

One of the best-known instances of the wave of persecutions occurred at Trier beginning in 1588. It included the trial and execution of the electoral magistrate and former rector of the university, Dietrich Flade, in 1589. The prosecutions in Trier did not go unnoticed elsewhere. Martin Del Rio, the polymath, humanist, former high ranking official of the government of the Spanish Netherlands in the Council of Brabant, and later a Jesuit, published his Disquisitionum Magicarum libri sex in 1599-1601 at Louvain. The work was first reprinted in 1608 and became the most recognized and influential justification for the prosecution of witches.13 Del Rio had attended the lectures on magic and witchcraft given by Juan Maldonado at the University of Paris in the 1570s, where one of his fellow students was Pierre de Lancre, who became a judge in the Labourd and the author of an important tract on witchcraft.14 Del Rio was familiar with the Flade case and the other persecutions at Trier, and his work was influential in triggering later prosecutions at Cologne and in Bavaria, as well as influencing prosecutions in neighboring Luxemburg.15

Popular beliefs about--and fears of --witchcraft survived longer than the mass persecutions and the willingness of courts to accept and try accusations of the crime of witchcraft. Generally, the refusal of elites, including magistrates and judges, from accepting charges of witchcraft for trial was one of the most prominent features of the decline of prosecutions and, eventually, beliefs. So, according to Ian Bostridge, was the influence of shifting political programs. By the end of the seventeenth century, belief in the reality of witchcraft could be marginalized and dismissed simply as the program of one political faction by members of another.16 Philosophical scepticism also contributed to the reluctance to prosecute, as did a growing transformation of theories of material causation and the limitations on the use of evidence derived from supernatural sources.

Among theologians on both sides of the Reformation divide, the idea of divine providence being more benevolent--and of the devil's influence being more restricted--took hold. In addition, social and intellectual elites began to withdraw from a mental and cultural world that they had long shared with the general population, and the condemnation of popular beliefs--including beliefs concerning sorcery and witchcraft--as erroneous increased during the later seventeenth century.17

THE HISTORICAL RECORD

As long as the widespread certainties of the criminal nature of witchcraft and the actual prosecutions lasted, however, they left a substantial record, one that informs us of far more than witchcraft itself. Most of this record exists in the archives and other records of courts, but it is difficult to extract these materials from the jurisdictional contexts in which they are imbedded without writing regional history, in which particular movements of prosecution are linked to local social and political stress points and the general local use of criminal law.18 Occasionally, accounts of individual trials and regional prosecutions are described, paraphrased, or summarized in the independent literature of demonology and witchcraft that is the subject of this website. It is always useful to consider the relation between particular instances and localities of persecution and individual works in the theoretical literature. There is often a correlation.

-notes-



12James Sharpe, Instruments of Darkness, 32.
13Lea, Materials, II, 640-646; Clark, 535; De Ridder-Symoens, "Intellectual and Political Backgrounds;" Julio Caro Baroja, "Martín del Rio y sus Disquisiciones mágicas," in El señor Inquisidor y otras vidas por oficio (Madrid, 1968), 171-196; E. Fischer, Die ‘Disquisitionum Magicarum libri sex' von Martin Delrio als gegenreformatorische Exempel-Quelle (Bamberg, 1975); Briggs, Witches and Neighbors, 347-351.
14Clark, 535; Margaret M. McGowan, "Pierre de Lancre's Tableau de l'inconstance des mauvais anges et démons: The Sabbat Sensationalized," in Anglo, The Damned Art, 182-201, at 187; Lea, Materials, III, 1292-1304.
15Wolfgang Behringer, Witchcraft Persecutions in Bavaria. On Luxemburg, see Marie-Sylvie Dupont-Bouchat, "La répression de la sorcellerie dans le Duché de Luxembourg aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles. Une analyse des structures de pouvoir et de leur fonctionnement dans le cadre de la chasse aux sorcières," in Prophètes et sorcières dans les Pays-Bas XVIe-XVIIe siècle, Marie-Sylvie Dupont-Bouchat, Willem Frijhoff, Robert Muchembled (Paris, 1978), 41-154, at 78-86.
16Ian Bostridge, Witchcraft and Its Transformations, c. 1650-c. 1750 (Oxford, 1997). For the broader political and juridical background, see Clark, Thinking with Demons, 549-682.
17The classic study on this point is that of Natalie Zemon Davis, "Proverbial Wisdom and Popular Errors," in Davis, Society and Culture in Early Modern France (Stanford, 1975), 227-267. Most histories of the idea and the persecutions discuss the end of the persecutions. There is a particularly useful collection of essays in Von Unfug de Hexen-Prozesses. Gegner der Hexenverfolgung von Johann Weyer bis Friedrich Spee, Wolfenbüteler Forschungen, Band. 55, Hartmut Lehmann and Otto Ulbricht, eds. (Wiesbaden, 1992), and Das Ende der Hexenverfolgung, Sönke Lorenz and Dieter Bauer, eds. (Stuttgart, 1995), Hexenforschung, Vol. I. On recent research in Germanophone areas, see Wolfgang Behringer, Witchcraft Studies in Austria, Germany and Switzerland.
18Excellent examples are the work of H. C. Erik Midelfort, Witch Hunting in Southwestern Germany, 1562-1684 (Stanford, 1972); Christina Larner, Enemies of God: The Witch-Hunt in Scotland (London, 1981); Paravy, De la chrétienté romaine à la réforme en Dauphiné; Hexenprozesse. Deutsche und skandinavische Beiträge, Christian Degn, Hartmut Lehmann, Dagmar Unverhau, eds. (Neumünster, 1983); Early Modern European Witchcraft: Centres and Peripheries, Bengt Ankarloo and Gustav Henningsen, eds. (Oxford, 1990); Wolfgang Behringer, Hexenverfolgung in Bayerb, Volksmagie, Glaubenseifer und Staaträson in der Frühen Neuzeit (Munich, 1987; Eng. Trans., Witchcraft Persecutions in Bavaria: Popular magic, religious zealotry and reason of state in early modern Europe, J.C. Grayson and David Lededrer, trans. [Chicago, 1971]); Muchembled, Magie et sorcellerie en Europe.