Economist.com

SEARCH




Sunday February 13th 2005 denotes premium content | Log in | Free registration | Help

OPINION
WORLD
BUSINESS
FINANCE
SCIENCE
Technology Quarterly


PEOPLE
BOOKS & ARTS
MARKETS
DIVERSIONS
Cities and Countries


Management
Reading

Business Education
Executive Dialogue



Articles by subject
Backgrounders
Surveys
Economics A-Z
Style guide
Business
  encyclopedia




Full contents
Past issues



Free registration
Web subscriptions
Print subscriptions
Academic offers
Gift vouchers
Mobile editions
E-mail alerts
RSS feeds


EIU online store

Classifieds
Business education, recruitment, business and personal: click here



Economist.com
The Economist
Global Agenda
Contact us
Media Directory
Advertising info
Job opportunities



Media Directory
Staff Books


Advertisement

Printable page

E-mail this

The shape of the universe

Platonic truths
Oct 9th 2003
From The Economist print edition


Data from an American satellite suggest that the universe is a dodecahedron

THERE are five Platonic solids of perfect symmetry. Three, the tetrahedron, octahedron and icosahedron, have triangular faces. A fourth, the cube, has square faces. The fifth, the dodecahedron, has pentagonal faces. Plato believed that the first four corresponded to the elements of which the Greeks thought the material world was composed: fire, air, water and earth. The dodecahedron, however, corresponded to quintessence, the element of the heavens. As Plato put it, “God used this solid for the whole universe, embroidering figures on it.” And if the arguments of a paper in this week's Nature stand up, Plato will have been proved right. For Jean-Pierre Luminet, of the Paris Observatory, and his colleagues believe that the universe is, indeed, a dodecahedron.

RELATED ITEMS
From The Economist
The myth-makers
Jan 3rd 2002

More articles about...
Space

Websites
Mr Luminet and colleagues' article is published in Nature.

Advertisment


They base their argument on data collected by the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP). This American satellite has been examining the microwave radiation generated shortly after the universe began. The wavelength of this radiation is remarkably pure, but like a musical note it has harmonics associated with it. These harmonics, like those of a note, reflect the shape of the object in which the waves were generated. In the case of the note, that object is a musical instrument. In the case of the microwave background, that object is the universe itself.

The most widely accepted model of the universe suggests that it is both flat and infinite. In this case, flatness does not mean it is two-dimensional, but that the space of which it is composed has no large-scale curves in it. (Small curves induced by gravitational fields, and predicted by the theory of relativity, do exist.) WMAP's data are in close agreement with this model, but that agreement is not perfect. In particular, the second and third harmonics of the microwave radiation are weaker than expected. Dr Luminet's calculations suggest that this weakness can be explained if the universe is finite and dodecahedron-shaped. Of course, things are not quite that simple. Familiar dodecahedrons have an inside and an outside. What Dr Luminet is proposing is actually something called a dodecahedral space, first described by his countryman Jules-Henri Poincaré in the 19th century. Such a space has no boundary, even though it has a finite volume. But it is, quintessentially, a dodecahedron. One up to the Greeks.





OPINION | WORLD | BUSINESS | FINANCE & ECONOMICS | SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
PEOPLE | BOOKS & ARTS | MARKETS & DATA | DIVERSIONS | PRINT EDITION


Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2005. All rights reserved.
Advertising info | Legal disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Help



Mobile editions RSS feeds E-mails Subscribe Email and Mobile Editions Help